Skip to main content
Technology Comparison

Registration vs Georeferencing: Point Cloud Alignment Methods

An expert comparison to help you choose the right equipment for your project.

Feature Registration Georeferencing
Reference Internal/targets Survey points/GNSS
Accuracy Very high Survey-dependent
Coordinates Local Global
Workflow Scan-to-scan Control-based
Service Pricing Standard feature Survey equipment needed
Option A Relative Alignment

Registration

Scan-to-scan alignment using internal references

Registration aligns multiple scans using internal targets or features, creating a unified point cloud in local project coordinates.

Pros

  • Very high accuracy
  • No external data
  • Works anywhere
  • Immediate results

Cons

  • Local coordinates only
  • No real-world position
  • Project-specific
  • Not shareable

Best For

Object scanningInternal projectsIsolated work
Option B Global Positioning

Georeferencing

Real-world coordinate positioning using survey control

Georeferencing positions scan data in real-world coordinates using survey control points or GNSS for GIS integration and cross-project compatibility.

Pros

  • Real-world coordinates
  • Integration ready
  • GIS compatible
  • Shareable data

Cons

  • Survey control needed
  • Additional equipment
  • More complex
  • Field work required

Best For

ConstructionGIS integrationMulti-project sites

Our Expert Verdict

Depends on Your Needs

Registration for internal work, Georeferencing for real-world integration.

Choose Registration if...

Choose registration for self-contained projects without geospatial needs.

Choose Georeferencing if...

Choose georeferencing when data must integrate with maps, GIS, or other surveys.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I always need georeferencing?

No, many projects work fine with registration only. GIS integration requires georeferencing.

Need Help Choosing?

Our experts can recommend the right equipment for your specific project requirements.

Licensed & Insured
1hr Response