Skip to main content
Technology Comparison

Real-Time vs Post-Processing: Scanning Workflow Approaches

An expert comparison to help you choose the right equipment for your project.

Feature Real-Time Processing Post-Processing
Feedback Immediate Delayed
Hardware On-device Desktop/cloud
Verification In-field Later
Learning Minimal Extensive
Service Pricing Premium equipment cost Software investment
Option A Live Feedback

Real-Time Processing

Immediate on-device data verification

Real-time processing provides instant feedback and verification directly on scanning hardware.

Pros

  • Instant verification
  • Fewer revisits
  • Live QC
  • Immediate results

Cons

  • Processing limits
  • Battery drain
  • Limited analysis
  • Device constraints

Best For

Field verificationQuick decisionsQuality control
Option B Office Workflow

Post-Processing

Desktop-based processing for maximum quality

Post-processing uses desktop or cloud computing for advanced analysis and maximum quality output.

Pros

  • Full processing power
  • Advanced analysis
  • Batch operations
  • Maximum quality

Cons

  • Delayed feedback
  • Potential revisits
  • Workflow gaps
  • Storage needs

Best For

Maximum qualityComplex projectsDetailed analysis

Our Expert Verdict

Depends on Your Needs

Real-time for field verification, Post-processing for final deliverables.

Choose Real-Time Processing if...

Choose real-time processing for immediate field verification and QC.

Choose Post-Processing if...

Choose post-processing for maximum quality and detailed analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use both approaches?

Yes, real-time for field QC and post-processing for final deliverables is common.

Need Help Choosing?

Our experts can recommend the right equipment for your specific project requirements.

Licensed & Insured
1hr Response