Skip to main content
Technology Comparison

3D Scanning vs Traditional Surveying

An expert comparison to help you choose the right equipment for your project.

Feature 3D Laser Scanning Traditional Surveying
Data Type Point cloud (millions of points) Individual points
Accuracy ±2mm ±3mm
Coverage Complete environment Selective points
Output Point cloud, BIM, drawings 2D plans, survey reports
Speed 10,000+ sqft/day Varies by complexity
Detail Everything captured Only measured points
Service Pricing $2,500 - $8,000 per project $1,500 - $4,500 per project
Option A Modern Reality Capture

3D Laser Scanning

Complete 3D Documentation

3D laser scanning captures millions of measurement points per second, creating a complete digital record of existing conditions. BIM-ready data for design and analysis.

Pros

  • Complete documentation
  • BIM-ready
  • Faster for complex spaces
  • Nothing missed

Cons

  • Higher equipment cost
  • Large data files
  • Processing required

Best For

Renovation projectsBIM documentationComplex facilities
Option B Conventional Methods

Traditional Surveying

Selective Measurements

Traditional surveying uses total stations and tape measures to capture specific points. Proven methodology for boundary surveys and select measurements.

Pros

  • Lower equipment cost
  • Familiar methodology
  • Good for boundaries
  • Smaller data

Cons

  • Incomplete data
  • Time-consuming
  • Must revisit for missed measurements

Best For

Boundary surveysSimple measurementsProperty surveys

Our Expert Verdict

Tie - Choose Based on Your Needs

3D scanning for complete documentation and BIM; traditional surveying for boundary surveys and simple measurements. Scanning is preferred for renovation and construction.

Choose 3D Laser Scanning if...

Choose 3D scanning for renovation projects, BIM documentation, and any project where complete existing conditions are needed.

Choose Traditional Surveying if...

Choose traditional surveying for boundary surveys, property surveys, and simple measurement tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is scanning replacing surveying?

Scanning complements surveying for as-built documentation; traditional methods remain important for boundary work.

Which is more cost-effective?

Scanning is more cost-effective for complex spaces; traditional for simple surveys.

Do I need both?

Many projects use both: scanning for documentation and traditional for control/boundaries.

Need Help Choosing?

Our experts can recommend the right equipment for your specific project requirements.

Licensed & Insured
1hr Response